De Broglie Wavelength Equation: Complete Guide to Matter Waves

The De Broglie Wavelength Formula

The de Broglie wavelength equation relates a particle's wavelength to its momentum:

Since momentum equals mass times velocity (p = mv), this can also be written as:

Where:

• λ (lambda) = de Broglie wavelength (meters)
• h = Planck's constant = 6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s (exact value)
• p = momentum (kg·m/s)
• m = mass of the particle (kg)
• v = velocity of the particle (m/s)

The equation shows that the de Broglie wavelength is inversely proportional to both mass and velocity. Heavier or faster particles have shorter wavelengths, while lighter or slower particles have longer wavelengths.

Historical Background: Wave-Particle Duality

The concept of wave-particle duality emerged from a series of discoveries in the early 20th century:

The Photon: Light as Particles

In 1905, Albert Einstein explained the photoelectric effect by proposing that light consists of discrete packets of energy called photons. Each photon has energy E = hf, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency. Einstein showed that a photon's momentum is:

This established that light, traditionally understood as a wave, also behaves as particles.

De Broglie's Hypothesis: Matter as Waves

Louis de Broglie, in his 1924 PhD thesis, proposed the reverse: if waves (light) can behave as particles, then particles (matter) should also behave as waves. He hypothesized that any particle with momentum p has an associated wavelength:

This bold hypothesis was initially theoretical, but it was soon confirmed experimentally.

Experimental Confirmation

In 1927, Clinton Davisson and Lester Germer at Bell Labs demonstrated electron diffraction—electrons scattering off a nickel crystal produced an interference pattern, just like X-rays (which are waves). This proved that electrons have wave-like properties. Independently, George Paget Thomson observed electron diffraction through thin metal films. Both experiments confirmed de Broglie's hypothesis, and de Broglie received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1929.

Physical Constants for Calculations

To calculate de Broglie wavelengths, you need these fundamental constants and particle masses:

Planck's Constant

Particle Masses

Note: 1 u (unified atomic mass unit) = 1.66054 × 10⁻²⁷ kg

Other Useful Constants

Calculating De Broglie Wavelength: Step-by-Step

Step 1: Identify the Particle and Its Properties

Determine the mass of the particle (in kg) and its velocity (in m/s). For common particles like electrons or protons, use the standard masses above.

Step 2: Calculate Momentum

If velocity is given directly:

p = m × v

If kinetic energy is given instead, use:

p = √(2mE)

where E is the kinetic energy in joules.

Step 3: Apply the De Broglie Equation

λ = h / p = 6.62607015 × 10⁻³⁴ / p

Step 4: Convert to Appropriate Units

For subatomic particles, wavelengths are often extremely small. Convert from meters to more practical units:

• nanometers (nm): multiply by 10⁹
• picometers (pm): multiply by 10¹²
• angstroms (Å): multiply by 10¹⁰

Worked Examples

Example 1: Electron at Moderate Speed

Problem: Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of an electron moving at 1.0 × 10⁶ m/s.

Given:

• Mass of electron: m = 9.1094 × 10⁻³¹ kg
• Velocity: v = 1.0 × 10⁶ m/s
• Planck's constant: h = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s

Solution:

1. Calculate momentum: p = mv = (9.1094 × 10⁻³¹)(1.0 × 10⁶) = 9.1094 × 10⁻²⁵ kg·m/s
2. Apply de Broglie equation: λ = h/p = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴)/(9.1094 × 10⁻²⁵)
3. λ = 7.27 × 10⁻¹⁰ m = 0.727 nm = 7.27 Å

Answer: 0.727 nm (comparable to atomic dimensions)

Example 2: Electron Accelerated Through a Potential

Problem: An electron is accelerated through a potential difference of 100 V. What is its de Broglie wavelength?

Given:

• Potential difference: V = 100 V
• Kinetic energy gained: E = eV = (1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹)(100) = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁷ J

Solution:

1. Calculate momentum from kinetic energy: p = √(2mE)
2. p = √(2 × 9.1094 × 10⁻³¹ × 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁷)
3. p = √(2.919 × 10⁻⁴⁷) = 5.40 × 10⁻²⁴ kg·m/s
4. λ = h/p = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴)/(5.40 × 10⁻²⁴) = 1.23 × 10⁻¹⁰ m

Answer: 0.123 nm = 1.23 Å

Shortcut formula for electrons: λ (nm) = 1.226 / √V, where V is in volts

Check: 1.226 / √100 = 1.226 / 10 = 0.1226 nm ✓

Example 3: Thermal Neutrons

Problem: Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of a thermal neutron at room temperature (T = 300 K).

Given:

• Mass of neutron: m = 1.6749 × 10⁻²⁷ kg
• Average kinetic energy: E = (3/2)kT, where k = 1.381 × 10⁻²³ J/K

Solution:

1. Calculate thermal energy: E = (3/2)(1.381 × 10⁻²³)(300) = 6.21 × 10⁻²¹ J
2. Calculate momentum: p = √(2mE) = √(2 × 1.6749 × 10⁻²⁷ × 6.21 × 10⁻²¹)
3. p = √(2.08 × 10⁻⁴⁷) = 4.56 × 10⁻²⁴ kg·m/s
4. λ = h/p = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴)/(4.56 × 10⁻²⁴) = 1.45 × 10⁻¹⁰ m

Answer: 0.145 nm = 1.45 Å

Thermal neutrons have wavelengths comparable to atomic spacings, making them ideal for neutron diffraction studies of crystal structures.

Example 4: Proton at High Energy

Problem: A proton has kinetic energy of 1 MeV. What is its de Broglie wavelength?

Given:

• Mass of proton: m = 1.6726 × 10⁻²⁷ kg
• Kinetic energy: E = 1 MeV = 1 × 10⁶ × 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ J = 1.602 × 10⁻¹³ J

Solution:

1. Calculate momentum: p = √(2mE) = √(2 × 1.6726 × 10⁻²⁷ × 1.602 × 10⁻¹³)
2. p = √(5.36 × 10⁻⁴⁰) = 2.32 × 10⁻²⁰ kg·m/s
3. λ = h/p = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴)/(2.32 × 10⁻²⁰) = 2.86 × 10⁻¹⁴ m

Answer: 28.6 fm (femtometers)

This wavelength is comparable to nuclear dimensions (~1-10 fm), making MeV protons useful for probing nuclear structure.

Example 5: Baseball (Macroscopic Object)

Problem: Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of a 145 g baseball thrown at 40 m/s (about 90 mph).

Given:

• Mass: m = 0.145 kg
• Velocity: v = 40 m/s

Solution:

1. Calculate momentum: p = mv = (0.145)(40) = 5.8 kg·m/s
2. λ = h/p = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴)/(5.8) = 1.14 × 10⁻³⁴ m

Answer: 1.14 × 10⁻³⁴ m

This wavelength is about 10⁻²⁰ times smaller than an atomic nucleus! For macroscopic objects, the de Broglie wavelength is so incredibly small that wave-like behavior is completely undetectable. This explains why we don't observe quantum effects in everyday life.

Relativistic De Broglie Wavelength

When particles move at speeds approaching the speed of light, relativistic effects become significant. The relativistic momentum is:

The de Broglie wavelength then becomes:

For particles with known kinetic energy, the relativistic momentum is:

Example: Relativistic Electron

Problem: Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of an electron traveling at 0.8c (80% the speed of light).

Solution:

1. Calculate the Lorentz factor: γ = 1/√(1 - 0.8²) = 1/√(1 - 0.64) = 1/√0.36 = 1/0.6 = 1.667
2. Calculate relativistic momentum: p = γmv = 1.667 × 9.109 × 10⁻³¹ × 0.8 × 3 × 10⁸
3. p = 3.64 × 10⁻²² kg·m/s
4. λ = h/p = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ / 3.64 × 10⁻²² = 1.82 × 10⁻¹² m = 1.82 pm

Answer: 1.82 pm (0.00182 nm)

Compare this to the non-relativistic calculation, which would give λ = h/(mv) = 3.03 pm. The relativistic correction reduces the wavelength by about 40%.

Applications of De Broglie Wavelengths

Electron Microscopy

Electron microscopes exploit the short de Broglie wavelength of accelerated electrons to achieve much higher resolution than optical microscopes. The resolution limit of any imaging system is approximately equal to the wavelength used.

• Optical microscope: Limited by visible light wavelengths (~500 nm), resolution ~200 nm
• Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM): Electrons at 10-30 kV, λ ≈ 0.01-0.007 nm, practical resolution ~1-10 nm
• Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM): Electrons at 100-300 kV, λ ≈ 0.004-0.002 nm, resolution ~0.1-0.2 nm

Modern aberration-corrected TEMs can resolve individual atoms!

Electron Diffraction

When electrons pass through crystalline materials, they diffract according to their de Broglie wavelength. This technique, called electron diffraction, is used to:

• Determine crystal structures
• Analyze thin films and surfaces
• Study phase transitions
• Characterize nanomaterials

Low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) uses electrons with wavelengths of 0.5-5 Å, ideal for probing surface atomic arrangements.

Neutron Diffraction

Thermal neutrons (E ~ 25 meV, λ ~ 1.8 Å) are particularly useful for studying crystal structures because:

• They scatter off atomic nuclei, complementing X-ray diffraction which scatters off electron clouds
• They can locate light atoms (like hydrogen) that are nearly invisible to X-rays
• They have magnetic moments, allowing study of magnetic structures
• They penetrate deeply into materials

Atom Interferometry

Even entire atoms can exhibit wave-like behavior. Atom interferometers use the de Broglie wavelength of cold atoms to make extremely precise measurements of:

• Gravitational acceleration
• Rotation rates (for navigation)
• Fundamental constants
• Gravitational waves (proposed future detectors)

Understanding the Hydrogen Atom

The de Broglie hypothesis helps explain why electrons in atoms occupy discrete energy levels. For a stable orbit, the electron's de Broglie wave must form a standing wave that fits exactly around the orbit circumference:

This leads directly to the Bohr quantization condition: L = mvr = nℏ

Comparison: De Broglie Wavelengths of Different Particles

To illustrate how mass and velocity affect the de Broglie wavelength, consider particles at the same kinetic energy (1 eV = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ J):

At the same energy, lighter particles have longer wavelengths because they move faster (E = ½mv²), and the wavelength scales as 1/√m for non-relativistic particles at fixed energy.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Connection

The de Broglie wavelength is intimately connected to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. If a particle has a well-defined wavelength λ, it has a well-defined momentum p = h/λ. But a wave with a single wavelength extends infinitely in space—its position is completely undefined.

The uncertainty principle states:

To localize a particle (reduce Δx), you need a superposition of many wavelengths (wave packet), which increases the uncertainty in momentum (and thus wavelength). This fundamental trade-off is a direct consequence of wave-particle duality.

Useful Formulas for Specific Situations

Electrons Accelerated Through Potential V

Thermal Particles at Temperature T

Particle with Kinetic Energy E

Photon-Equivalent Wavelength

For comparison, a photon with the same energy as a particle's kinetic energy has wavelength:

This is always much longer than the de Broglie wavelength of a massive particle with the same energy.

Why Macroscopic Objects Don't Show Wave Behavior

The de Broglie equation applies to all matter, but wave effects are only observable when the wavelength is comparable to relevant physical dimensions (like slits, obstacles, or atomic spacings).

For macroscopic objects:

• A 70 kg person walking at 1 m/s has λ = 9.5 × 10⁻³⁶ m
• A dust particle (10⁻⁹ kg) drifting at 1 mm/s has λ = 6.6 × 10⁻²² m
• A bacterium (10⁻¹² kg) swimming at 10 μm/s has λ = 6.6 × 10⁻¹⁷ m

Even for a bacterium, the wavelength is 10¹⁰ times smaller than a proton! There are no physical structures small enough to diffract such tiny wavelengths, so quantum interference effects are completely unobservable for macroscopic objects. This is why classical mechanics works perfectly well for everyday objects.

The boundary between quantum and classical behavior is an active area of research. Experiments have demonstrated wave-like interference with molecules containing over 2,000 atoms, pushing the limits of where quantum mechanics applies.

Particle Properties Comparison Table

When calculating de Broglie wavelengths, you need accurate values for particle mass, charge, and other properties. The following comprehensive table compares the key physical properties of common particles encountered in quantum mechanics calculations.

The mass ratio between particles is particularly important for understanding their de Broglie wavelengths. The proton is 1,836 times heavier than the electron, meaning that at the same velocity, a proton's de Broglie wavelength is 1,836 times shorter. The muon, at about 207 times the electron mass, sits between the electron and proton, and muon diffraction experiments have confirmed de Broglie's hypothesis for this particle as well.

The inclusion of fullerene (C₆₀) in the table is significant. In 1999, researchers at the University of Vienna demonstrated quantum interference with C₆₀ molecules, proving that even molecules containing 60 carbon atoms (with a mass over a million times that of an electron) exhibit wave-particle duality. More recent experiments have shown interference with molecules exceeding 25,000 atomic mass units.

De Broglie Wavelengths at Various Velocities

The de Broglie wavelength depends on both mass and velocity. This table shows how wavelength changes across a wide range of velocities for three important particles: the electron, proton, and neutron. All values use the non-relativistic formula λ = h/(mv), except where noted.

*Relativistic values calculated using λ = h/(γmv), where γ = 1/√(1 - v²/c²).

Several key observations emerge from this table. First, electron wavelengths at typical electron microscopy speeds (10⁵-10⁷ m/s) range from about 7 nm down to 0.07 nm, which is why electron microscopes can resolve atomic structures. Second, neutron wavelengths at thermal velocities (corresponding to room temperature, roughly 2,200 m/s) are around 0.18 nm, which is comparable to interatomic spacings in crystals, making thermal neutrons ideal for diffraction studies. Third, the relativistic correction becomes significant above about 0.1c, reducing the wavelength compared to the non-relativistic prediction.

Historical Timeline of Quantum Mechanics Milestones

The de Broglie wavelength equation did not emerge in isolation. It was part of a revolutionary transformation in physics during the early 20th century. The following timeline places de Broglie's contribution in the context of the broader development of quantum mechanics.

De Broglie's 1924 hypothesis was a turning point in physics. Before his work, waves and particles were considered entirely separate phenomena. Light was known to behave as both (through Young's double-slit experiment and Einstein's photoelectric effect), but no one had suggested that matter itself might exhibit wave behavior. The experimental confirmations by Davisson-Germer and Thomson within just three years of the hypothesis transformed it from a bold theoretical speculation into an established physical fact.

The progressive demonstration of matter-wave interference with ever-larger objects continues to this day. Each new record pushes the boundary between the quantum and classical worlds, addressing one of the deepest questions in physics: where exactly does quantum behavior give way to classical behavior? The current record holders are organic molecules containing over 2,000 atoms, with de Broglie wavelengths on the order of femtometers.

Summary

The de Broglie wavelength equation λ = h/p = h/(mv) is fundamental to quantum mechanics:

• Wave-particle duality: All matter exhibits wave-like properties
• Inverse relationships: Wavelength decreases with increasing mass or velocity
• Planck's constant (h = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J·s) sets the scale for quantum effects
• Practical importance: Enables electron microscopy, diffraction studies, and atom interferometry
• Classical limit: Macroscopic objects have wavelengths far too small to observe wave effects

Use our de Broglie wavelength calculator to quickly compute matter wave wavelengths for electrons, protons, neutrons, and custom particles.

Frequently Asked Questions